RE: DTD Versions

[Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc@cu-portland.edu>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frederik Fouvry [mailto:fouvry@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de]
> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2000 7:15 AM
> To: poet@linuxports.com
> Cc: wbrooks@lug.ee.calpoly.edu; ldp-docbook@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: DTD Versions
> 
> ,-- On Fri, 2 Jun, you wrote:
> | 
> | Hello,
> | 
> | I don't know about the rest of you but I think we should ONLY accept
> | Docbook 3.1 at this time. It is the only official version. 
> 4.0 is still in
> | beta and we can't have a bunch of different markup running around.
> | 
> | J
> 
> Since about two weeks this is not true anymore.  But you're right
> about sticking to 3.1 for the time being.  The differences are not
> _that_ big anyway, and careful markup can make the transition even
> easier.

Unless you want to use PNG graphics, that is.  They weren't supported in
3.1, for the GNOME docs we had to use a custom DTD so that we could include
PNG screen shots. 
	Greg


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-docbook-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org